Reliability and accuracy of dental MRI for measuring root canal length of incisors and canines: a clinical pilot study.

To evaluate whether high-resolution, non-contrast-enhanced dental MRI (dMRI) can reliably and accurately measure the canal length of incisors and canines compared with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Three-Tesla dMRI was performed in 31 participants (mean age: 50.1 ± 14.2 years) with CBCT data. In total, 67 teeth were included (28 from the upper jaw and 39 from the lower jaw; 25 central incisors, 22 lateral incisors, and 20 canines). CBCT and dMRI datasets were reconstructed to visualize the root canal pathway in a single slice in the vestibulo-oral (V-O) and mesio-distal (M-D) direction. Root canal length was measured twice by two radiologists using dMRI and CBCT. Data were statistically analyzed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and performing Bland-Altman analysis. The reliability of dMRI measurements was excellent and comparable to that of CBCT measurements (intra-rater I/intra-rater II/inter-rater was 0.990/0.965/0.951 for dMRI vs. 0.990/0.994/0.992 for CBCT in the M-D direction and 0.991/0.956/0.967 for dMRI vs. 0.998/0.994/0.996 for CBCT in the V-O direction). According to Bland-Altman analysis, the mean (95% confidence interval) underestimation of root canal lengths was 0.67 mm (- 1.22 to 2.57) for dMRI and 0.87 mm (- 0.29 to 2.04) for CBCT in the M-D direction/V-O direction. In 92.5% of cases, dMRI measurements of canal length had an accuracy within 0-2 mm. Visualization and measurement of canal length in vivo using dMRI is feasible. The reliability of dMRI measurements was high and comparable to that of CBCT measurements. However, the spatial and temporal resolution of dMRI is lower than that of CBCT, which means dMRI measurements are less accurate than CBCT measurements. This means dMRI is currently unsuitable for measuring canal length in clinical practice.

Endodontic working length measurements of premolars and molars in high-resolution dental MRI: a clinical pilot study for assessment of reliability and accuracy.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the reliability and accuracy of high-resolution, dental MRI (dMRI) for endodontic working length (WL) measurements of premolars and molars under clinical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-Tesla dMRI was performed in 9 subjects who also had undergone cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (mean age: 47 ± 13.5 years). A total of 34 root canals from 12 molars (4/8, upper/lower jaw; 22 root canals) and 11 premolars (2/9 upper/lower jaw; 12 root canals) were included. CBCT and dMRI datasets were reconstructed to visualize the root canal in one single slice. Subsequently, two radiologists measured the root canal lengths in both modalities twice in blinded fashion. Reliability and accuracy for both modalities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Reliability (intra-rater I/II; inter-rater) of dental MRI measurements was excellent and comparable to CBCT for premolars (0.993/0.900; 0.958 vs. 0.993/0.956; 0.951) and for molars (0.978/0.995; 0.986 vs. 0.992/0.996; 0.989). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean underestimation/bias (95% confidence interval) of dMRI measurements of 0.8 (- 1.44/3.05) mm for premolars and 0.4 (- 1.55/2.39) mm for molars. In up to 59% of the cases, the accuracy of dMRI for WL measurements was within the underestimation margin of 0 to 2 mm short of the apical foramen AF. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo demonstration and measurement of WL are feasible using dMRI. The reliability of measurements is high and equivalent to CBCT. Nonetheless, due to lower spatial resolution and longer acquisition time, the accuracy of dMRI is inferior to CBCT, impeding its current use for clinical treatment planning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: dMRI is a promising radiation-free imaging technique. Its reliability for endodontic working length measurements is high, but its accuracy is not satisfactory enough yet.

Use of dental MRI for radiation-free guided dental implant planning: a prospective, in vivo study of accuracy and reliability.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of dental MRI for static guided implant surgery planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, a 0.4-mm isotropic, artifact-suppressed, 3T MRI protocol was used for implant planning and surgical guide production in participants in need of dental implants. Two dentists decided on treatment plan. Surgical guides were placed intraorally during a subsequent reference cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Inter-rater and inter-modality agreement were assessed by Cohen's kappa. For each participant, dental MRI and CBCT datasets were co-registered to determine three-dimensional and angular deviations between planned and surgically guided implant positions. RESULTS: Forty-five implants among 30 study participants were planned and evaluated (17 women, 13 men, mean age 56.9 ± 13.1 years). Inter-rater agreement (mean κ 0.814; range 0.704-0.927) and inter-modality agreement (mean κ 0.879; range 0.782-0.901) were both excellent for the dental MRI-based treatment plans. Mean three-dimensional deviations were 1.1 ± 0.7 (entry point) and 1.3 ± 0.7 mm (apex). Mean angular deviation was 2.4 ± 1.5°. CBCT-based adjustments of MRI plans were necessary for implant position in 29.5% and for implant axis in 6.8% of all implant sites. Changes were larger in the group with shortened dental arches compared with those for tooth gaps. Except for one implant site, all guides were suitable for clinical use. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study indicates that dental MRI is reliable and sufficiently accurate for surgical guide production. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to increase its accuracy before it can be used for implant planning outside clinical trials. KEY POINTS: • An excellent reliability for the dental MRI-based treatment plans as well as agreement between dental MRI-based and CBCT-based (reference standard) decisions were noted. • Ideal implant position was not reached in all cases by dental MRI plans. • For all but one implant site surgical guides derived from dental MRI were sufficiently accurate to perform implant placement (mean three-dimensional deviations were 1.1 ± 0.7 (entry point) and 1.3 ± 0.7 mm (apex); mean angular deviation was 2.4 ± 1.5°).

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences.

As the number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners and patients with medical implants is constantly growing, radiologists increasingly encounter metallic implant-related artifacts in MRI, resulting in reduced image quality. Therefore, the MRI suitability of implants in terms of artifact volume, as well as the development of pulse sequences to reduce image artifacts, are becoming more and more important. Here, we present a comprehensive protocol which allows for a standardized evaluation of the artifact volume of implants on MRI. Furthermore, this protocol can be used to analyze the vulnerability of different pulse sequences to artifacts. The proposed protocol can be applied to T1- and T2-weighted images with or without fat-suppression and all passive implants. Furthermore, the procedure enables the separate and three-dimensional identification of signal loss and pile-up artifacts. As previous investigations differed greatly in evaluation methods, the comparability of their results was limited. Thus, standardized measurements of MRI artifact volumes are necessary to provide better comparability. This may improve the development of the MRI suitability of implants and better pulse sequences to finally improve patient care.

Fracture resistance of zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns after bur adjustment.

Intra-oral grinding is often required to optimize occlusion of all-ceramic restorations. The effect of burs of different grit size on the fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns was investigated in this study. Forty-eight standardized zirconia copings were produced. The ceramic veneer was designed with a positive ellipsoidal defect on the palatal aspect of the crowns. To simulate adjustment of dental restorations by burs, this palatal defect was removed by use of three different diamond-coated burs with grit sizes 46, 107, or 151 µm (fine, medium, or coarse, respectively). Each different grit size of bur was used to grind 16 crowns. All crowns were then polished and surface roughness was measured. Half of the specimens underwent thermomechanical aging (10,000 thermocycles between 6.5°C and 60°C) and 1.2 million cycles of chewing simulation (F = 108 N). A linear regression model was computed to test the effect of aging and grinding grit size at a level of significance of α = 0.05. Fracture loads increased with decreasing grit size. Grit size and aging had a significant effect on the fracture resistance of the crowns. Use of fine and coarse burs for intra-oral adjustments resulted in different fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns. Coarse burs should be avoided in the final stage of grinding before polishing.